Mauritius vs New Zealand: Paying taxes: Time to comply with VAT refund (hours)
Paying taxes: Time to comply with VAT refund (hours) over time
- Mauritius
- New Zealand
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 2 DB17-20 methodology against 1.5 DB17-20 methodology in Mauritius, a difference of 0.5 DB17-20 methodology.
That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.3 times Mauritius's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Mauritius ahead.
Mauritius ranks 89th and New Zealand ranks 87th of 103 countries.
Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: time to comply with vat refund (hours), Mauritius or New Zealand?
- New Zealand, at 2 DB17-20 methodology against 1.5 DB17-20 methodology in Mauritius as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: time to comply with vat refund (hours) between Mauritius and New Zealand?
- 0.5 DB17-20 methodology, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and New Zealand?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Mauritius and New Zealand rank globally for paying taxes: time to comply with vat refund (hours)?
- Mauritius ranks 89th and New Zealand ranks 87th of 103 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Time to comply with VAT refund (hours) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The time to comply with VAT refund measures the time spent preparing and submitting the refund claim and the time spent preparing information for the tax officers, if, in 50% or more of cases, a company that requests a VAT cash refund arising from a capital purchase would be selected for an additional review. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.