Lithuania vs Chinese Taipei: Paying taxes: Time to comply with VAT refund (hours)
Paying taxes: Time to comply with VAT refund (hours) over time
- Lithuania
- Chinese Taipei
How they compare
Chinese Taipei currently reports 3 DB17-20 methodology against 2.1 DB17-20 methodology in Lithuania, a difference of 0.9 DB17-20 methodology.
That makes Chinese Taipei's figure about 1.4 times Lithuania's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Chinese Taipei has been ahead every year.
Lithuania ranks 85th and Chinese Taipei ranks 82nd of 102 countries.
Chinese Taipei has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: time to comply with vat refund (hours), Lithuania or Chinese Taipei?
- Chinese Taipei, at 3 DB17-20 methodology against 2.1 DB17-20 methodology in Lithuania as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: time to comply with vat refund (hours) between Lithuania and Chinese Taipei?
- 0.9 DB17-20 methodology, with Chinese Taipei ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Chinese Taipei?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Lithuania and Chinese Taipei rank globally for paying taxes: time to comply with vat refund (hours)?
- Lithuania ranks 85th and Chinese Taipei ranks 82nd of 102 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Time to comply with VAT refund (hours) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The time to comply with VAT refund measures the time spent preparing and submitting the refund claim and the time spent preparing information for the tax officers, if, in 50% or more of cases, a company that requests a VAT cash refund arising from a capital purchase would be selected for an additional review. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.