Costa Rica vs Papua New Guinea: Paying taxes: Time to comply with VAT refund (hours)
Paying taxes: Time to comply with VAT refund (hours) over time
- Costa Rica
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 5.5 DB17-20 methodology against 5.5 DB17-20 methodology in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 69th and Papua New Guinea ranks 69th of 103 countries.
Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: time to comply with vat refund (hours), Costa Rica or Papua New Guinea?
- Costa Rica, at 5.5 DB17-20 methodology against 5.5 DB17-20 methodology in Papua New Guinea as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: time to comply with vat refund (hours) between Costa Rica and Papua New Guinea?
- 0 DB17-20 methodology, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Papua New Guinea?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Costa Rica and Papua New Guinea rank globally for paying taxes: time to comply with vat refund (hours)?
- Costa Rica ranks 69th and Papua New Guinea ranks 69th of 103 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Time to comply with VAT refund (hours) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The time to comply with VAT refund measures the time spent preparing and submitting the refund claim and the time spent preparing information for the tax officers, if, in 50% or more of cases, a company that requests a VAT cash refund arising from a capital purchase would be selected for an additional review. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.