Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of vs Palestine, State of: Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of
78.9
in 2019
Palestine, State of
78.9
in 2019
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of rank
120th
Palestine, State of rank
120th
Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction over time
- Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of
- Palestine, State of
How they compare
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of currently reports 78.9 against 78.9 in Palestine, State of, a difference of 0.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Palestine, State of has been ahead every year.
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of ranks 120th and Palestine, State of ranks 120th of 182 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction, Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of or Palestine, State of?
- Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of, at 78.9 against 78.9 in Palestine, State of as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction between Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of and Palestine, State of?
- 0, with Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of and Palestine, State of?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of and Palestine, State of rank globally for paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction?
- Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of ranks 120th and Palestine, State of ranks 120th of 182 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction (hours) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for time to comply with a corporate income tax correction benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.