San Marino vs Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of: Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction
San Marino
78.9
in 2019
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of
78.9
in 2019
San Marino rank
120th
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of rank
120th
Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction over time
- San Marino
- Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of
How they compare
San Marino currently reports 78.9 against 78.9 in Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of, a difference of 0.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of has been ahead every year.
San Marino ranks 120th and Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of ranks 120th of 182 countries.
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction, San Marino or Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of?
- San Marino, at 78.9 against 78.9 in Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction between San Marino and Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of?
- 0, with San Marino ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for San Marino and Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do San Marino and Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of rank globally for paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction?
- San Marino ranks 120th and Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of ranks 120th of 182 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction (hours) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for time to comply with a corporate income tax correction benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.