Guyana vs Iran, Islamic Republic of: Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction
Guyana
46.79
in 2019
Iran, Islamic Republic of
44.04
in 2019
Guyana rank
158th
Iran, Islamic Republic of rank
161st
Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction over time
- Guyana
- Iran, Islamic Republic of
How they compare
Guyana currently reports 46.79 against 44.04 in Iran, Islamic Republic of, a difference of 2.75.
That makes Guyana's figure about 1.1 times Iran, Islamic Republic of's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Guyana has been ahead every year.
Guyana ranks 158th and Iran, Islamic Republic of ranks 161st of 182 countries.
Guyana has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction, Guyana or Iran, Islamic Republic of?
- Guyana, at 46.79 against 44.04 in Iran, Islamic Republic of as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction between Guyana and Iran, Islamic Republic of?
- 2.75, with Guyana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guyana and Iran, Islamic Republic of?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Guyana and Iran, Islamic Republic of rank globally for paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction?
- Guyana ranks 158th and Iran, Islamic Republic of ranks 161st of 182 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction (hours) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for time to comply with a corporate income tax correction benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.