Suriname vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction
Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction over time
- Suriname
- Tanzania, United Republic of
How they compare
Suriname currently reports 5 DB17-20 methodology against 5 DB17-20 methodology in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Tanzania, United Republic of has been ahead every year.
Suriname ranks 107th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 107th of 181 countries.
Tanzania, United Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction, Suriname or Tanzania, United Republic of?
- Suriname, at 5 DB17-20 methodology against 5 DB17-20 methodology in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction between Suriname and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 0 DB17-20 methodology, with Suriname ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Suriname and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Suriname and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction?
- Suriname ranks 107th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 107th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction (hours) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The time to comply with a corporate income tax correction measures the time spent preparing and submitting the correction, and the time spent preparing information for the tax officers, if, in 25% or more of cases, a company that voluntarily reports an error in its CIT return and an underpayment of the tax due would be selected for additional review. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.