Russian Federation vs South Sudan: Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction
Russian Federation
6 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
South Sudan
6 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Russian Federation rank
98th
South Sudan rank
98th
Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction over time
- Russian Federation
- South Sudan
How they compare
Russian Federation currently reports 6 DB17-20 methodology against 6 DB17-20 methodology in South Sudan, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, South Sudan has been ahead every year.
Russian Federation ranks 98th and South Sudan ranks 98th of 181 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction, Russian Federation or South Sudan?
- Russian Federation, at 6 DB17-20 methodology against 6 DB17-20 methodology in South Sudan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction between Russian Federation and South Sudan?
- 0 DB17-20 methodology, with Russian Federation ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Russian Federation and South Sudan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Russian Federation and South Sudan rank globally for paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction?
- Russian Federation ranks 98th and South Sudan ranks 98th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction (hours) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The time to comply with a corporate income tax correction measures the time spent preparing and submitting the correction, and the time spent preparing information for the tax officers, if, in 25% or more of cases, a company that voluntarily reports an error in its CIT return and an underpayment of the tax due would be selected for additional review. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.