Romania vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction
Romania
2 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Saint Kitts and Nevis
2 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Romania rank
160th
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
160th
Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction over time
- Romania
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
Romania currently reports 2 DB17-20 methodology against 2 DB17-20 methodology in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Saint Kitts and Nevis has been ahead every year.
Romania ranks 160th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 160th of 181 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction, Romania or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- Romania, at 2 DB17-20 methodology against 2 DB17-20 methodology in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction between Romania and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 0 DB17-20 methodology, with Romania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Romania and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Romania and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction?
- Romania ranks 160th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 160th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction (hours) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The time to comply with a corporate income tax correction measures the time spent preparing and submitting the correction, and the time spent preparing information for the tax officers, if, in 25% or more of cases, a company that voluntarily reports an error in its CIT return and an underpayment of the tax due would be selected for additional review. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.