Poland vs United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction
Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction over time
- Poland
- United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 6 DB17-20 methodology against 6 DB17-20 methodology in United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland has been ahead every year.
Poland ranks 98th and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ranks 98th of 181 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction, Poland or United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
- Poland, at 6 DB17-20 methodology against 6 DB17-20 methodology in United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction between Poland and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
- 0 DB17-20 methodology, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Poland and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Poland and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland rank globally for paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction?
- Poland ranks 98th and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ranks 98th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction (hours) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The time to comply with a corporate income tax correction measures the time spent preparing and submitting the correction, and the time spent preparing information for the tax officers, if, in 25% or more of cases, a company that voluntarily reports an error in its CIT return and an underpayment of the tax due would be selected for additional review. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.