Panama vs Slovenia: Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction
Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction over time
- Panama
- Slovenia
How they compare
Slovenia currently reports 29 DB17-20 methodology against 28 DB17-20 methodology in Panama, a difference of 1 DB17-20 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Slovenia has been ahead every year.
Panama ranks 27th and Slovenia ranks 26th of 181 countries.
Slovenia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction, Panama or Slovenia?
- Slovenia, at 29 DB17-20 methodology against 28 DB17-20 methodology in Panama as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction between Panama and Slovenia?
- 1 DB17-20 methodology, with Slovenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and Slovenia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Panama and Slovenia rank globally for paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction?
- Panama ranks 27th and Slovenia ranks 26th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction (hours) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The time to comply with a corporate income tax correction measures the time spent preparing and submitting the correction, and the time spent preparing information for the tax officers, if, in 25% or more of cases, a company that voluntarily reports an error in its CIT return and an underpayment of the tax due would be selected for additional review. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.