Oman vs Rwanda: Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction
Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction over time
- Oman
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 19 DB17-20 methodology against 17.5 DB17-20 methodology in Oman, a difference of 1.5 DB17-20 methodology.
That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.1 times Oman's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Rwanda has been ahead every year.
Oman ranks 46th and Rwanda ranks 43rd of 181 countries.
Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction, Oman or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 19 DB17-20 methodology against 17.5 DB17-20 methodology in Oman as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction between Oman and Rwanda?
- 1.5 DB17-20 methodology, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Oman and Rwanda?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Oman and Rwanda rank globally for paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction?
- Oman ranks 46th and Rwanda ranks 43rd of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction (hours) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The time to comply with a corporate income tax correction measures the time spent preparing and submitting the correction, and the time spent preparing information for the tax officers, if, in 25% or more of cases, a company that voluntarily reports an error in its CIT return and an underpayment of the tax due would be selected for additional review. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.