Myanmar vs Syrian Arab Republic: Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction
Myanmar
10 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Syrian Arab Republic
10 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Myanmar rank
75th
Syrian Arab Republic rank
75th
Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction over time
- Myanmar
- Syrian Arab Republic
How they compare
Myanmar currently reports 10 DB17-20 methodology against 10 DB17-20 methodology in Syrian Arab Republic, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Syrian Arab Republic has been ahead every year.
Myanmar ranks 75th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 75th of 181 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction, Myanmar or Syrian Arab Republic?
- Myanmar, at 10 DB17-20 methodology against 10 DB17-20 methodology in Syrian Arab Republic as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction between Myanmar and Syrian Arab Republic?
- 0 DB17-20 methodology, with Myanmar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Myanmar and Syrian Arab Republic?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Myanmar and Syrian Arab Republic rank globally for paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction?
- Myanmar ranks 75th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 75th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction (hours) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The time to comply with a corporate income tax correction measures the time spent preparing and submitting the correction, and the time spent preparing information for the tax officers, if, in 25% or more of cases, a company that voluntarily reports an error in its CIT return and an underpayment of the tax due would be selected for additional review. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.