Myanmar vs Sao Tome and Principe: Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction
Myanmar
10 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Sao Tome and Principe
10 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Myanmar rank
75th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
75th
Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction over time
- Myanmar
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Myanmar currently reports 10 DB17-20 methodology against 10 DB17-20 methodology in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Sao Tome and Principe has been ahead every year.
Myanmar ranks 75th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 75th of 181 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction, Myanmar or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Myanmar, at 10 DB17-20 methodology against 10 DB17-20 methodology in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction between Myanmar and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 0 DB17-20 methodology, with Myanmar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Myanmar and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Myanmar and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction?
- Myanmar ranks 75th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 75th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction (hours) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The time to comply with a corporate income tax correction measures the time spent preparing and submitting the correction, and the time spent preparing information for the tax officers, if, in 25% or more of cases, a company that voluntarily reports an error in its CIT return and an underpayment of the tax due would be selected for additional review. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.