Republic of Moldova vs Uruguay: Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction
Republic of Moldova
2.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Uruguay
2.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Republic of Moldova rank
151st
Uruguay rank
151st
Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction over time
- Republic of Moldova
- Uruguay
How they compare
Republic of Moldova currently reports 2.5 DB17-20 methodology against 2.5 DB17-20 methodology in Uruguay, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Uruguay has been ahead every year.
Republic of Moldova ranks 151st and Uruguay ranks 151st of 181 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction, Republic of Moldova or Uruguay?
- Republic of Moldova, at 2.5 DB17-20 methodology against 2.5 DB17-20 methodology in Uruguay as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction between Republic of Moldova and Uruguay?
- 0 DB17-20 methodology, with Republic of Moldova ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Republic of Moldova and Uruguay?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Republic of Moldova and Uruguay rank globally for paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction?
- Republic of Moldova ranks 151st and Uruguay ranks 151st of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction (hours) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The time to comply with a corporate income tax correction measures the time spent preparing and submitting the correction, and the time spent preparing information for the tax officers, if, in 25% or more of cases, a company that voluntarily reports an error in its CIT return and an underpayment of the tax due would be selected for additional review. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.