Malawi vs Uganda: Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction
Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction over time
- Malawi
- Uganda
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 20.5 DB17-20 methodology against 20 DB17-20 methodology in Uganda, a difference of 0.5 DB17-20 methodology.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Uganda ahead.
Malawi ranks 39th and Uganda ranks 41st of 181 countries.
Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction, Malawi or Uganda?
- Malawi, at 20.5 DB17-20 methodology against 20 DB17-20 methodology in Uganda as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction between Malawi and Uganda?
- 0.5 DB17-20 methodology, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Uganda?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Malawi and Uganda rank globally for paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction?
- Malawi ranks 39th and Uganda ranks 41st of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction (hours) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The time to comply with a corporate income tax correction measures the time spent preparing and submitting the correction, and the time spent preparing information for the tax officers, if, in 25% or more of cases, a company that voluntarily reports an error in its CIT return and an underpayment of the tax due would be selected for additional review. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.