Lithuania vs Tunisia: Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction
Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction over time
- Lithuania
- Tunisia
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 1.5 DB17-20 methodology against 1.5 DB17-20 methodology in Tunisia, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Tunisia has been ahead every year.
Lithuania ranks 168th and Tunisia ranks 168th of 181 countries.
Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction, Lithuania or Tunisia?
- Lithuania, at 1.5 DB17-20 methodology against 1.5 DB17-20 methodology in Tunisia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction between Lithuania and Tunisia?
- 0 DB17-20 methodology, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Tunisia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Lithuania and Tunisia rank globally for paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction?
- Lithuania ranks 168th and Tunisia ranks 168th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction (hours) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The time to comply with a corporate income tax correction measures the time spent preparing and submitting the correction, and the time spent preparing information for the tax officers, if, in 25% or more of cases, a company that voluntarily reports an error in its CIT return and an underpayment of the tax due would be selected for additional review. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.