Libya vs Norway: Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction
Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction over time
- Libya
- Norway
How they compare
Norway currently reports 12 DB17-20 methodology against 11.5 DB17-20 methodology in Libya, a difference of 0.5 DB17-20 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Norway has been ahead every year.
Libya ranks 66th and Norway ranks 63rd of 181 countries.
Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction, Libya or Norway?
- Norway, at 12 DB17-20 methodology against 11.5 DB17-20 methodology in Libya as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction between Libya and Norway?
- 0.5 DB17-20 methodology, with Norway ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Norway?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Libya and Norway rank globally for paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction?
- Libya ranks 66th and Norway ranks 63rd of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction (hours) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The time to comply with a corporate income tax correction measures the time spent preparing and submitting the correction, and the time spent preparing information for the tax officers, if, in 25% or more of cases, a company that voluntarily reports an error in its CIT return and an underpayment of the tax due would be selected for additional review. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.