Kiribati vs Pakistan: Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction
Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction over time
- Kiribati
- Pakistan
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 81 DB17-20 methodology against 67.5 DB17-20 methodology in Pakistan, a difference of 13.5 DB17-20 methodology.
That makes Kiribati's figure about 1.2 times Pakistan's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Kiribati has been ahead every year.
Kiribati ranks 4th and Pakistan ranks 6th of 181 countries.
Kiribati has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction, Kiribati or Pakistan?
- Kiribati, at 81 DB17-20 methodology against 67.5 DB17-20 methodology in Pakistan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction between Kiribati and Pakistan?
- 13.5 DB17-20 methodology, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Pakistan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Kiribati and Pakistan rank globally for paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction?
- Kiribati ranks 4th and Pakistan ranks 6th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction (hours) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The time to comply with a corporate income tax correction measures the time spent preparing and submitting the correction, and the time spent preparing information for the tax officers, if, in 25% or more of cases, a company that voluntarily reports an error in its CIT return and an underpayment of the tax due would be selected for additional review. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.