Guinea-Bissau vs Chinese Taipei: Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction
Guinea-Bissau
6.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Chinese Taipei
6.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Guinea-Bissau rank
94th
Chinese Taipei rank
94th
Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction over time
- Guinea-Bissau
- Chinese Taipei
How they compare
Guinea-Bissau currently reports 6.5 DB17-20 methodology against 6.5 DB17-20 methodology in Chinese Taipei, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Chinese Taipei has been ahead every year.
Guinea-Bissau ranks 94th and Chinese Taipei ranks 94th of 181 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction, Guinea-Bissau or Chinese Taipei?
- Guinea-Bissau, at 6.5 DB17-20 methodology against 6.5 DB17-20 methodology in Chinese Taipei as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction between Guinea-Bissau and Chinese Taipei?
- 0 DB17-20 methodology, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Chinese Taipei?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Guinea-Bissau and Chinese Taipei rank globally for paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction?
- Guinea-Bissau ranks 94th and Chinese Taipei ranks 94th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction (hours) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The time to comply with a corporate income tax correction measures the time spent preparing and submitting the correction, and the time spent preparing information for the tax officers, if, in 25% or more of cases, a company that voluntarily reports an error in its CIT return and an underpayment of the tax due would be selected for additional review. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.