Guatemala vs Tonga: Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction
Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction over time
- Guatemala
- Tonga
How they compare
Guatemala currently reports 15 DB17-20 methodology against 14 DB17-20 methodology in Tonga, a difference of 1 DB17-20 methodology.
That makes Guatemala's figure about 1.1 times Tonga's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Guatemala has been ahead every year.
Guatemala ranks 51st and Tonga ranks 54th of 181 countries.
Guatemala has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction, Guatemala or Tonga?
- Guatemala, at 15 DB17-20 methodology against 14 DB17-20 methodology in Tonga as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction between Guatemala and Tonga?
- 1 DB17-20 methodology, with Guatemala ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Tonga?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Guatemala and Tonga rank globally for paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction?
- Guatemala ranks 51st and Tonga ranks 54th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction (hours) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The time to comply with a corporate income tax correction measures the time spent preparing and submitting the correction, and the time spent preparing information for the tax officers, if, in 25% or more of cases, a company that voluntarily reports an error in its CIT return and an underpayment of the tax due would be selected for additional review. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.