France vs Iceland: Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction
Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction over time
- France
- Iceland
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 3.75 DB17-20 methodology against 3.5 DB17-20 methodology in France, a difference of 0.25 DB17-20 methodology.
That makes Iceland's figure about 1.1 times France's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Iceland has been ahead every year.
France ranks 126th and Iceland ranks 125th of 181 countries.
Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction, France or Iceland?
- Iceland, at 3.75 DB17-20 methodology against 3.5 DB17-20 methodology in France as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction between France and Iceland?
- 0.25 DB17-20 methodology, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for France and Iceland?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do France and Iceland rank globally for paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction?
- France ranks 126th and Iceland ranks 125th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction (hours) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The time to comply with a corporate income tax correction measures the time spent preparing and submitting the correction, and the time spent preparing information for the tax officers, if, in 25% or more of cases, a company that voluntarily reports an error in its CIT return and an underpayment of the tax due would be selected for additional review. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.