Ethiopia vs Samoa: Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction
Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction over time
- Ethiopia
- Samoa
How they compare
Samoa currently reports 8.5 DB17-20 methodology against 8 DB17-20 methodology in Ethiopia, a difference of 0.5 DB17-20 methodology.
That makes Samoa's figure about 1.1 times Ethiopia's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Samoa has been ahead every year.
Ethiopia ranks 87th and Samoa ranks 86th of 181 countries.
Samoa has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction, Ethiopia or Samoa?
- Samoa, at 8.5 DB17-20 methodology against 8 DB17-20 methodology in Ethiopia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction between Ethiopia and Samoa?
- 0.5 DB17-20 methodology, with Samoa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Samoa?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Ethiopia and Samoa rank globally for paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction?
- Ethiopia ranks 87th and Samoa ranks 86th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction (hours) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The time to comply with a corporate income tax correction measures the time spent preparing and submitting the correction, and the time spent preparing information for the tax officers, if, in 25% or more of cases, a company that voluntarily reports an error in its CIT return and an underpayment of the tax due would be selected for additional review. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.