Ethiopia vs Finland: Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction
Ethiopia
8 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Finland
8 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Ethiopia rank
87th
Finland rank
87th
Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction over time
- Ethiopia
- Finland
How they compare
Ethiopia currently reports 8 DB17-20 methodology against 8 DB17-20 methodology in Finland, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Finland has been ahead every year.
Ethiopia ranks 87th and Finland ranks 87th of 181 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction, Ethiopia or Finland?
- Ethiopia, at 8 DB17-20 methodology against 8 DB17-20 methodology in Finland as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction between Ethiopia and Finland?
- 0 DB17-20 methodology, with Ethiopia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Finland?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Ethiopia and Finland rank globally for paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction?
- Ethiopia ranks 87th and Finland ranks 87th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction (hours) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The time to comply with a corporate income tax correction measures the time spent preparing and submitting the correction, and the time spent preparing information for the tax officers, if, in 25% or more of cases, a company that voluntarily reports an error in its CIT return and an underpayment of the tax due would be selected for additional review. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.