Eritrea vs Nicaragua: Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction
Eritrea
9 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Nicaragua
9 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Eritrea rank
81st
Nicaragua rank
81st
Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction over time
- Eritrea
- Nicaragua
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 9 DB17-20 methodology against 9 DB17-20 methodology in Nicaragua, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Nicaragua has been ahead every year.
Eritrea ranks 81st and Nicaragua ranks 81st of 181 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction, Eritrea or Nicaragua?
- Eritrea, at 9 DB17-20 methodology against 9 DB17-20 methodology in Nicaragua as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction between Eritrea and Nicaragua?
- 0 DB17-20 methodology, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Nicaragua?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Eritrea and Nicaragua rank globally for paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction?
- Eritrea ranks 81st and Nicaragua ranks 81st of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction (hours) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The time to comply with a corporate income tax correction measures the time spent preparing and submitting the correction, and the time spent preparing information for the tax officers, if, in 25% or more of cases, a company that voluntarily reports an error in its CIT return and an underpayment of the tax due would be selected for additional review. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.