El Salvador vs Hong Kong, China: Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction
Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction over time
- El Salvador
- Hong Kong, China
How they compare
Hong Kong, China currently reports 2.75 DB17-20 methodology against 2.5 DB17-20 methodology in El Salvador, a difference of 0.25 DB17-20 methodology.
That makes Hong Kong, China's figure about 1.1 times El Salvador's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was El Salvador ahead.
El Salvador ranks 151st and Hong Kong, China ranks 150th of 181 countries.
El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction, El Salvador or Hong Kong, China?
- Hong Kong, China, at 2.75 DB17-20 methodology against 2.5 DB17-20 methodology in El Salvador as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction between El Salvador and Hong Kong, China?
- 0.25 DB17-20 methodology, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Hong Kong, China?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do El Salvador and Hong Kong, China rank globally for paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction?
- El Salvador ranks 151st and Hong Kong, China ranks 150th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction (hours) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The time to comply with a corporate income tax correction measures the time spent preparing and submitting the correction, and the time spent preparing information for the tax officers, if, in 25% or more of cases, a company that voluntarily reports an error in its CIT return and an underpayment of the tax due would be selected for additional review. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.