Egypt vs Lebanon: Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction
Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction over time
- Egypt
- Lebanon
How they compare
Egypt currently reports 24.5 DB17-20 methodology against 23 DB17-20 methodology in Lebanon, a difference of 1.5 DB17-20 methodology.
That makes Egypt's figure about 1.1 times Lebanon's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Egypt has been ahead every year.
Egypt ranks 30th and Lebanon ranks 33rd of 181 countries.
Egypt has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction, Egypt or Lebanon?
- Egypt, at 24.5 DB17-20 methodology against 23 DB17-20 methodology in Lebanon as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction between Egypt and Lebanon?
- 1.5 DB17-20 methodology, with Egypt ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Lebanon?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Egypt and Lebanon rank globally for paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction?
- Egypt ranks 30th and Lebanon ranks 33rd of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction (hours) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The time to comply with a corporate income tax correction measures the time spent preparing and submitting the correction, and the time spent preparing information for the tax officers, if, in 25% or more of cases, a company that voluntarily reports an error in its CIT return and an underpayment of the tax due would be selected for additional review. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.