Ecuador vs Republic of Moldova: Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction
Ecuador
2.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Republic of Moldova
2.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Ecuador rank
151st
Republic of Moldova rank
151st
Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction over time
- Ecuador
- Republic of Moldova
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 2.5 DB17-20 methodology against 2.5 DB17-20 methodology in Republic of Moldova, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Republic of Moldova has been ahead every year.
Ecuador ranks 151st and Republic of Moldova ranks 151st of 181 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction, Ecuador or Republic of Moldova?
- Ecuador, at 2.5 DB17-20 methodology against 2.5 DB17-20 methodology in Republic of Moldova as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction between Ecuador and Republic of Moldova?
- 0 DB17-20 methodology, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Republic of Moldova?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Ecuador and Republic of Moldova rank globally for paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction?
- Ecuador ranks 151st and Republic of Moldova ranks 151st of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction (hours) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The time to comply with a corporate income tax correction measures the time spent preparing and submitting the correction, and the time spent preparing information for the tax officers, if, in 25% or more of cases, a company that voluntarily reports an error in its CIT return and an underpayment of the tax due would be selected for additional review. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.