Congo, Democratic Republic of the vs Malta: Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction
Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction over time
- Congo, Democratic Republic of the
- Malta
How they compare
Malta currently reports 24.5 DB17-20 methodology against 23 DB17-20 methodology in Congo, Democratic Republic of the, a difference of 1.5 DB17-20 methodology.
That makes Malta's figure about 1.1 times Congo, Democratic Republic of the's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.
Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 33rd and Malta ranks 30th of 181 countries.
Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction, Congo, Democratic Republic of the or Malta?
- Malta, at 24.5 DB17-20 methodology against 23 DB17-20 methodology in Congo, Democratic Republic of the as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction between Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Malta?
- 1.5 DB17-20 methodology, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Malta?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Malta rank globally for paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction?
- Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 33rd and Malta ranks 30th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction (hours) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The time to comply with a corporate income tax correction measures the time spent preparing and submitting the correction, and the time spent preparing information for the tax officers, if, in 25% or more of cases, a company that voluntarily reports an error in its CIT return and an underpayment of the tax due would be selected for additional review. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.