Comoros vs Libya: Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction
Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction over time
- Comoros
- Libya
How they compare
Comoros currently reports 12 DB17-20 methodology against 11.5 DB17-20 methodology in Libya, a difference of 0.5 DB17-20 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Comoros has been ahead every year.
Comoros ranks 63rd and Libya ranks 66th of 181 countries.
Comoros has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction, Comoros or Libya?
- Comoros, at 12 DB17-20 methodology against 11.5 DB17-20 methodology in Libya as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction between Comoros and Libya?
- 0.5 DB17-20 methodology, with Comoros ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Libya?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Comoros and Libya rank globally for paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction?
- Comoros ranks 63rd and Libya ranks 66th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction (hours) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The time to comply with a corporate income tax correction measures the time spent preparing and submitting the correction, and the time spent preparing information for the tax officers, if, in 25% or more of cases, a company that voluntarily reports an error in its CIT return and an underpayment of the tax due would be selected for additional review. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.