China vs Georgia: Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction
Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction over time
- China
- Georgia
How they compare
China currently reports 1 DB17-20 methodology against 1 DB17-20 methodology in Georgia, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was China ahead.
China ranks 178th and Georgia ranks 178th of 181 countries.
China has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction, China or Georgia?
- China, at 1 DB17-20 methodology against 1 DB17-20 methodology in Georgia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction between China and Georgia?
- 0 DB17-20 methodology, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Georgia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do China and Georgia rank globally for paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction?
- China ranks 178th and Georgia ranks 178th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction (hours) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The time to comply with a corporate income tax correction measures the time spent preparing and submitting the correction, and the time spent preparing information for the tax officers, if, in 25% or more of cases, a company that voluntarily reports an error in its CIT return and an underpayment of the tax due would be selected for additional review. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.