Central African Republic vs Sudan: Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction
Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction over time
- Central African Republic
- Sudan
How they compare
Central African Republic currently reports 66 DB17-20 methodology against 60 DB17-20 methodology in Sudan, a difference of 6 DB17-20 methodology.
That makes Central African Republic's figure about 1.1 times Sudan's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Central African Republic has been ahead every year.
Central African Republic ranks 7th and Sudan ranks 8th of 181 countries.
Central African Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction, Central African Republic or Sudan?
- Central African Republic, at 66 DB17-20 methodology against 60 DB17-20 methodology in Sudan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction between Central African Republic and Sudan?
- 6 DB17-20 methodology, with Central African Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Sudan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Central African Republic and Sudan rank globally for paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction?
- Central African Republic ranks 7th and Sudan ranks 8th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction (hours) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The time to comply with a corporate income tax correction measures the time spent preparing and submitting the correction, and the time spent preparing information for the tax officers, if, in 25% or more of cases, a company that voluntarily reports an error in its CIT return and an underpayment of the tax due would be selected for additional review. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.