Central African Republic vs Kiribati: Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction
Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction over time
- Central African Republic
- Kiribati
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 81 DB17-20 methodology against 66 DB17-20 methodology in Central African Republic, a difference of 15 DB17-20 methodology.
That makes Kiribati's figure about 1.2 times Central African Republic's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Kiribati has been ahead every year.
Central African Republic ranks 7th and Kiribati ranks 4th of 181 countries.
Kiribati has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction, Central African Republic or Kiribati?
- Kiribati, at 81 DB17-20 methodology against 66 DB17-20 methodology in Central African Republic as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction between Central African Republic and Kiribati?
- 15 DB17-20 methodology, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Kiribati?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Central African Republic and Kiribati rank globally for paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction?
- Central African Republic ranks 7th and Kiribati ranks 4th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction (hours) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The time to comply with a corporate income tax correction measures the time spent preparing and submitting the correction, and the time spent preparing information for the tax officers, if, in 25% or more of cases, a company that voluntarily reports an error in its CIT return and an underpayment of the tax due would be selected for additional review. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.