Cameroon vs Japan: Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction
Cameroon
3 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Japan
3 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Cameroon rank
137th
Japan rank
137th
Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction over time
- Cameroon
- Japan
How they compare
Cameroon currently reports 3 DB17-20 methodology against 3 DB17-20 methodology in Japan, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Japan has been ahead every year.
Cameroon ranks 137th and Japan ranks 137th of 181 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction, Cameroon or Japan?
- Cameroon, at 3 DB17-20 methodology against 3 DB17-20 methodology in Japan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction between Cameroon and Japan?
- 0 DB17-20 methodology, with Cameroon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and Japan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Cameroon and Japan rank globally for paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction?
- Cameroon ranks 137th and Japan ranks 137th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction (hours) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The time to comply with a corporate income tax correction measures the time spent preparing and submitting the correction, and the time spent preparing information for the tax officers, if, in 25% or more of cases, a company that voluntarily reports an error in its CIT return and an underpayment of the tax due would be selected for additional review. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.