Burundi vs San Marino: Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction
Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction over time
- Burundi
- San Marino
How they compare
Burundi currently reports 13 DB17-20 methodology against 13 DB17-20 methodology in San Marino, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, San Marino has been ahead every year.
Burundi ranks 59th and San Marino ranks 59th of 181 countries.
San Marino has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction, Burundi or San Marino?
- Burundi, at 13 DB17-20 methodology against 13 DB17-20 methodology in San Marino as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction between Burundi and San Marino?
- 0 DB17-20 methodology, with Burundi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and San Marino?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Burundi and San Marino rank globally for paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction?
- Burundi ranks 59th and San Marino ranks 59th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction (hours) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The time to comply with a corporate income tax correction measures the time spent preparing and submitting the correction, and the time spent preparing information for the tax officers, if, in 25% or more of cases, a company that voluntarily reports an error in its CIT return and an underpayment of the tax due would be selected for additional review. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.