Botswana vs Grenada: Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction
Botswana
4 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Grenada
4 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Botswana rank
117th
Grenada rank
117th
Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction over time
- Botswana
- Grenada
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 4 DB17-20 methodology against 4 DB17-20 methodology in Grenada, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Grenada has been ahead every year.
Botswana ranks 117th and Grenada ranks 117th of 181 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction, Botswana or Grenada?
- Botswana, at 4 DB17-20 methodology against 4 DB17-20 methodology in Grenada as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction between Botswana and Grenada?
- 0 DB17-20 methodology, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Grenada?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Botswana and Grenada rank globally for paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction?
- Botswana ranks 117th and Grenada ranks 117th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction (hours) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The time to comply with a corporate income tax correction measures the time spent preparing and submitting the correction, and the time spent preparing information for the tax officers, if, in 25% or more of cases, a company that voluntarily reports an error in its CIT return and an underpayment of the tax due would be selected for additional review. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.