Benin vs Zambia: Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction
Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction over time
- Benin
- Zambia
How they compare
Zambia currently reports 3.25 DB17-20 methodology against 3 DB17-20 methodology in Benin, a difference of 0.25 DB17-20 methodology.
That makes Zambia's figure about 1.1 times Benin's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Zambia has been ahead every year.
Benin ranks 137th and Zambia ranks 136th of 181 countries.
Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction, Benin or Zambia?
- Zambia, at 3.25 DB17-20 methodology against 3 DB17-20 methodology in Benin as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction between Benin and Zambia?
- 0.25 DB17-20 methodology, with Zambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Benin and Zambia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Benin and Zambia rank globally for paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction?
- Benin ranks 137th and Zambia ranks 136th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction (hours) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The time to comply with a corporate income tax correction measures the time spent preparing and submitting the correction, and the time spent preparing information for the tax officers, if, in 25% or more of cases, a company that voluntarily reports an error in its CIT return and an underpayment of the tax due would be selected for additional review. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.