Belarus vs Georgia: Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction
Belarus
1 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Georgia
1 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Belarus rank
178th
Georgia rank
178th
Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction over time
- Belarus
- Georgia
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 1 DB17-20 methodology against 1 DB17-20 methodology in Georgia, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Georgia has been ahead every year.
Belarus ranks 178th and Georgia ranks 178th of 181 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction, Belarus or Georgia?
- Belarus, at 1 DB17-20 methodology against 1 DB17-20 methodology in Georgia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction between Belarus and Georgia?
- 0 DB17-20 methodology, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Georgia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Belarus and Georgia rank globally for paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction?
- Belarus ranks 178th and Georgia ranks 178th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction (hours) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The time to comply with a corporate income tax correction measures the time spent preparing and submitting the correction, and the time spent preparing information for the tax officers, if, in 25% or more of cases, a company that voluntarily reports an error in its CIT return and an underpayment of the tax due would be selected for additional review. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.