Austria vs Latvia: Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction
Austria
2.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Latvia
2.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Austria rank
151st
Latvia rank
151st
Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction over time
- Austria
- Latvia
How they compare
Austria currently reports 2.5 DB17-20 methodology against 2.5 DB17-20 methodology in Latvia, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Austria ranks 151st and Latvia ranks 151st of 181 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction, Austria or Latvia?
- Austria, at 2.5 DB17-20 methodology against 2.5 DB17-20 methodology in Latvia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction between Austria and Latvia?
- 0 DB17-20 methodology, with Austria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Latvia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Austria and Latvia rank globally for paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction?
- Austria ranks 151st and Latvia ranks 151st of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction (hours) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The time to comply with a corporate income tax correction measures the time spent preparing and submitting the correction, and the time spent preparing information for the tax officers, if, in 25% or more of cases, a company that voluntarily reports an error in its CIT return and an underpayment of the tax due would be selected for additional review. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.