Austria vs Ecuador: Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction
Austria
2.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Ecuador
2.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Austria rank
151st
Ecuador rank
151st
Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction over time
- Austria
- Ecuador
How they compare
Austria currently reports 2.5 DB17-20 methodology against 2.5 DB17-20 methodology in Ecuador, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Ecuador has been ahead every year.
Austria ranks 151st and Ecuador ranks 151st of 181 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction, Austria or Ecuador?
- Austria, at 2.5 DB17-20 methodology against 2.5 DB17-20 methodology in Ecuador as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction between Austria and Ecuador?
- 0 DB17-20 methodology, with Austria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Ecuador?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Austria and Ecuador rank globally for paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction?
- Austria ranks 151st and Ecuador ranks 151st of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction (hours) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The time to comply with a corporate income tax correction measures the time spent preparing and submitting the correction, and the time spent preparing information for the tax officers, if, in 25% or more of cases, a company that voluntarily reports an error in its CIT return and an underpayment of the tax due would be selected for additional review. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.