Argentina vs Russian Federation: Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction
Argentina
6 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Russian Federation
6 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Argentina rank
98th
Russian Federation rank
98th
Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction over time
- Argentina
- Russian Federation
How they compare
Argentina currently reports 6 DB17-20 methodology against 6 DB17-20 methodology in Russian Federation, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Russian Federation has been ahead every year.
Argentina ranks 98th and Russian Federation ranks 98th of 181 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction, Argentina or Russian Federation?
- Argentina, at 6 DB17-20 methodology against 6 DB17-20 methodology in Russian Federation as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction between Argentina and Russian Federation?
- 0 DB17-20 methodology, with Argentina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Russian Federation?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Argentina and Russian Federation rank globally for paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction?
- Argentina ranks 98th and Russian Federation ranks 98th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction (hours) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The time to comply with a corporate income tax correction measures the time spent preparing and submitting the correction, and the time spent preparing information for the tax officers, if, in 25% or more of cases, a company that voluntarily reports an error in its CIT return and an underpayment of the tax due would be selected for additional review. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.