Angola vs Finland: Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction
Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction over time
- Angola
- Finland
How they compare
Finland currently reports 8 DB17-20 methodology against 7 DB17-20 methodology in Angola, a difference of 1 DB17-20 methodology.
That makes Finland's figure about 1.1 times Angola's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Finland has been ahead every year.
Angola ranks 90th and Finland ranks 87th of 181 countries.
Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction, Angola or Finland?
- Finland, at 8 DB17-20 methodology against 7 DB17-20 methodology in Angola as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction between Angola and Finland?
- 1 DB17-20 methodology, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Finland?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Angola and Finland rank globally for paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction?
- Angola ranks 90th and Finland ranks 87th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction (hours) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The time to comply with a corporate income tax correction measures the time spent preparing and submitting the correction, and the time spent preparing information for the tax officers, if, in 25% or more of cases, a company that voluntarily reports an error in its CIT return and an underpayment of the tax due would be selected for additional review. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.