Algeria vs Romania: Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction
Algeria
2 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Romania
2 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Algeria rank
160th
Romania rank
160th
Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction over time
- Algeria
- Romania
How they compare
Algeria currently reports 2 DB17-20 methodology against 2 DB17-20 methodology in Romania, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Romania has been ahead every year.
Algeria ranks 160th and Romania ranks 160th of 181 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction, Algeria or Romania?
- Algeria, at 2 DB17-20 methodology against 2 DB17-20 methodology in Romania as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction between Algeria and Romania?
- 0 DB17-20 methodology, with Algeria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Algeria and Romania?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Algeria and Romania rank globally for paying taxes: time to comply with corporate income tax correction?
- Algeria ranks 160th and Romania ranks 160th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Time to comply with corporate income tax correction (hours) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The time to comply with a corporate income tax correction measures the time spent preparing and submitting the correction, and the time spent preparing information for the tax officers, if, in 25% or more of cases, a company that voluntarily reports an error in its CIT return and an underpayment of the tax due would be selected for additional review. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.