Timor-Leste vs Palestine, State of: Paying taxes: Time to complete a corporate income tax correction
Paying taxes: Time to complete a corporate income tax correction over time
- Timor-Leste
- Palestine, State of
How they compare
Palestine, State of currently reports 80.14 DB17-20 methodology against 64.57 DB17-20 methodology in Timor-Leste, a difference of 15.57 DB17-20 methodology.
That makes Palestine, State of's figure about 1.2 times Timor-Leste's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Palestine, State of has been ahead every year.
Timor-Leste ranks 8th and Palestine, State of ranks 6th of 181 countries.
Palestine, State of has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: time to complete a corporate income tax correction, Timor-Leste or Palestine, State of?
- Palestine, State of, at 80.14 DB17-20 methodology against 64.57 DB17-20 methodology in Timor-Leste as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: time to complete a corporate income tax correction between Timor-Leste and Palestine, State of?
- 15.57 DB17-20 methodology, with Palestine, State of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Timor-Leste and Palestine, State of?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Timor-Leste and Palestine, State of rank globally for paying taxes: time to complete a corporate income tax correction?
- Timor-Leste ranks 8th and Palestine, State of ranks 6th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Time to complete a corporate income tax correction (weeks) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Time to complete a corporate income tax correction (weeks) (DB17-20 methodology) measures the time to complete a review by the tax authority including a formal tax audit if in 25% or more of cases, a company that voluntarily reports an error in its corporate income tax return and an underpayment of the tax due would be selected for additional review. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.