Peru vs South Africa: Paying taxes: Time to complete a corporate income tax correction
Paying taxes: Time to complete a corporate income tax correction over time
- Peru
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 31.57 DB17-20 methodology against 30.57 DB17-20 methodology in Peru, a difference of 1 DB17-20 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, South Africa has been ahead every year.
Peru ranks 22nd and South Africa ranks 21st of 181 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: time to complete a corporate income tax correction, Peru or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 31.57 DB17-20 methodology against 30.57 DB17-20 methodology in Peru as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: time to complete a corporate income tax correction between Peru and South Africa?
- 1 DB17-20 methodology, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and South Africa?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Peru and South Africa rank globally for paying taxes: time to complete a corporate income tax correction?
- Peru ranks 22nd and South Africa ranks 21st of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Time to complete a corporate income tax correction (weeks) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Time to complete a corporate income tax correction (weeks) (DB17-20 methodology) measures the time to complete a review by the tax authority including a formal tax audit if in 25% or more of cases, a company that voluntarily reports an error in its corporate income tax return and an underpayment of the tax due would be selected for additional review. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.