Mozambique vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Paying taxes: Time to complete a corporate income tax correction
Paying taxes: Time to complete a corporate income tax correction over time
- Mozambique
- Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
How they compare
Mozambique currently reports 9.57 DB17-20 methodology against 9.29 DB17-20 methodology in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, a difference of 0.28 DB17-20 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Mozambique has been ahead every year.
Mozambique ranks 61st and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 62nd of 181 countries.
Mozambique has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: time to complete a corporate income tax correction, Mozambique or Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- Mozambique, at 9.57 DB17-20 methodology against 9.29 DB17-20 methodology in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: time to complete a corporate income tax correction between Mozambique and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- 0.28 DB17-20 methodology, with Mozambique ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mozambique and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Mozambique and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank globally for paying taxes: time to complete a corporate income tax correction?
- Mozambique ranks 61st and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 62nd of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Time to complete a corporate income tax correction (weeks) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Time to complete a corporate income tax correction (weeks) (DB17-20 methodology) measures the time to complete a review by the tax authority including a formal tax audit if in 25% or more of cases, a company that voluntarily reports an error in its corporate income tax return and an underpayment of the tax due would be selected for additional review. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.