Lao People's Democratic Republic vs Peru: Paying taxes: Time to complete a corporate income tax correction
Paying taxes: Time to complete a corporate income tax correction over time
- Lao People's Democratic Republic
- Peru
How they compare
Lao People's Democratic Republic currently reports 31.71 DB17-20 methodology against 30.57 DB17-20 methodology in Peru, a difference of 1.14 DB17-20 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Lao People's Democratic Republic has been ahead every year.
Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 20th and Peru ranks 22nd of 181 countries.
Lao People's Democratic Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: time to complete a corporate income tax correction, Lao People's Democratic Republic or Peru?
- Lao People's Democratic Republic, at 31.71 DB17-20 methodology against 30.57 DB17-20 methodology in Peru as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: time to complete a corporate income tax correction between Lao People's Democratic Republic and Peru?
- 1.14 DB17-20 methodology, with Lao People's Democratic Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lao People's Democratic Republic and Peru?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Lao People's Democratic Republic and Peru rank globally for paying taxes: time to complete a corporate income tax correction?
- Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 20th and Peru ranks 22nd of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Time to complete a corporate income tax correction (weeks) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Time to complete a corporate income tax correction (weeks) (DB17-20 methodology) measures the time to complete a review by the tax authority including a formal tax audit if in 25% or more of cases, a company that voluntarily reports an error in its corporate income tax return and an underpayment of the tax due would be selected for additional review. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.