Kenya vs San Marino: Paying taxes: Time to complete a corporate income tax correction
Paying taxes: Time to complete a corporate income tax correction over time
- Kenya
- San Marino
How they compare
San Marino currently reports 13.86 DB17-20 methodology against 13.14 DB17-20 methodology in Kenya, a difference of 0.72 DB17-20 methodology.
That makes San Marino's figure about 1.1 times Kenya's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, San Marino has been ahead every year.
Kenya ranks 53rd and San Marino ranks 51st of 181 countries.
San Marino has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: time to complete a corporate income tax correction, Kenya or San Marino?
- San Marino, at 13.86 DB17-20 methodology against 13.14 DB17-20 methodology in Kenya as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: time to complete a corporate income tax correction between Kenya and San Marino?
- 0.72 DB17-20 methodology, with San Marino ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and San Marino?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Kenya and San Marino rank globally for paying taxes: time to complete a corporate income tax correction?
- Kenya ranks 53rd and San Marino ranks 51st of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Time to complete a corporate income tax correction (weeks) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Time to complete a corporate income tax correction (weeks) (DB17-20 methodology) measures the time to complete a review by the tax authority including a formal tax audit if in 25% or more of cases, a company that voluntarily reports an error in its corporate income tax return and an underpayment of the tax due would be selected for additional review. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.