Iran, Islamic Republic of vs Malta: Paying taxes: Time to complete a corporate income tax correction
Paying taxes: Time to complete a corporate income tax correction over time
- Iran, Islamic Republic of
- Malta
How they compare
Malta currently reports 46.29 DB17-20 methodology against 38.86 DB17-20 methodology in Iran, Islamic Republic of, a difference of 7.43 DB17-20 methodology.
That makes Malta's figure about 1.2 times Iran, Islamic Republic of's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.
Iran, Islamic Republic of ranks 13th and Malta ranks 11th of 181 countries.
Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: time to complete a corporate income tax correction, Iran, Islamic Republic of or Malta?
- Malta, at 46.29 DB17-20 methodology against 38.86 DB17-20 methodology in Iran, Islamic Republic of as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: time to complete a corporate income tax correction between Iran, Islamic Republic of and Malta?
- 7.43 DB17-20 methodology, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iran, Islamic Republic of and Malta?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Iran, Islamic Republic of and Malta rank globally for paying taxes: time to complete a corporate income tax correction?
- Iran, Islamic Republic of ranks 13th and Malta ranks 11th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Time to complete a corporate income tax correction (weeks) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Time to complete a corporate income tax correction (weeks) (DB17-20 methodology) measures the time to complete a review by the tax authority including a formal tax audit if in 25% or more of cases, a company that voluntarily reports an error in its corporate income tax return and an underpayment of the tax due would be selected for additional review. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.