Guyana vs Russian Federation: Paying taxes: Time to complete a corporate income tax correction
Paying taxes: Time to complete a corporate income tax correction over time
- Guyana
- Russian Federation
How they compare
Russian Federation currently reports 11.2 DB17-20 methodology against 9.79 DB17-20 methodology in Guyana, a difference of 1.41 DB17-20 methodology.
That makes Russian Federation's figure about 1.1 times Guyana's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Russian Federation has been ahead every year.
Guyana ranks 60th and Russian Federation ranks 58th of 181 countries.
Russian Federation has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: time to complete a corporate income tax correction, Guyana or Russian Federation?
- Russian Federation, at 11.2 DB17-20 methodology against 9.79 DB17-20 methodology in Guyana as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: time to complete a corporate income tax correction between Guyana and Russian Federation?
- 1.41 DB17-20 methodology, with Russian Federation ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guyana and Russian Federation?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Guyana and Russian Federation rank globally for paying taxes: time to complete a corporate income tax correction?
- Guyana ranks 60th and Russian Federation ranks 58th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Time to complete a corporate income tax correction (weeks) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Time to complete a corporate income tax correction (weeks) (DB17-20 methodology) measures the time to complete a review by the tax authority including a formal tax audit if in 25% or more of cases, a company that voluntarily reports an error in its corporate income tax return and an underpayment of the tax due would be selected for additional review. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.